- I reviewed the rule of three for writing an EQ.
2. Review the following EQ's and tell us if they meet the rule of three and why they do or do not.
- What is the most important factor in healthy weight loss?
- This EQ does follow the rule of three.
- It allows for more research in different methods, benefits, and consequences to healthy weight loss.
- The answer can be based on facts but also on opinion which allows the person to take a stance (pick sides).
- The question is clear and specific in what it is asking for.
- What is most important to securing a conviction in a criminal investigation?
- This EQ does follow the rule of three.
- This question allows for more research on various parts of criminal investigations, convictions, and their processes.
- This answer can be viewed from multiple points that allow the person to take a stance.
- The question in very clear and specific to what it's asking.
- What is most important in creating a hairstyle that best satisfies a customer?
- This EQ does not follow the rule of three.
- It allows for further research into different hairstyles, psychological satisfaction on deciding on a hairstyle, and customer satisfaction.
- The answer can have different stances because a topic such as hairstyles can be very opinionated.
- The question doesn't seem to be specific enough and can have a very broad range of answers.
- How can an anesthesiologist best treat chronic pain?
- This EQ does not follow the rule of three.
- It allows for more research on the general topic on chronic pain and curing it.
- The answer seems that it would be heavily relied on facts and can't really be argued against.
- The question is clear and specific.
3. Based on your review of the rule of three and your experience with assessing four EQ's, please write another draft EQ for your senior project.
- What is the most effective method a theatre actor/actress can use to best build character?
No comments:
Post a Comment